The UK Farm Assurance Review (December 2024) has laid bare the frustrations of farmers navigating the complexities of assurance schemes. The message is clear: farm assurance must evolve to reduce stress, cut duplication, and embrace technology.
One farmer’s statement encapsulated the problem:
“I don't think I would ever join a scheme again, the stress was far too high, I have never been so depressed in my preparation, during and after a visit. I'm happier now, with returns just as good.”
Audits have become an overwhelming burden, with one business even experiencing up to 17 inspections in 20 months. The cost, complexity, and mental toll of compliance are making some consider a complete move away from assurance schemes altogether.
Yet, the reality so often remains—assurance is a prerequisite for market access. Farmers are expected to comply with multiple overlapping schemes, yet these schemes lack coordination, increasing the workload without adding meaningful value.
The Review makes one thing clear: technology is key. A streamlined system that eliminates duplication and simplifies compliance would transform farm assurance from a bureaucratic headache into a valuable tool for farmers.
Currently, only 25% of farmers in the Red Tractor scheme use its online portal. Many assurance schemes have digital tools, yet engagement remains low. The solution lies in making these tools intuitive, effective, integrated, and truly beneficial to the user.
A single online portal integrating all assurance schemes into one audit process was suggested by industry stakeholders. This could provide:
The Farm Assurance Review recommends:
Mental health support in agriculture is crucial, especially as the burden of compliance grows. Organisations like Yellow Wellies (The Farm Safety Foundation) do incredible work in promoting farmer well-being and breaking the stigma around mental health.
The Review highlights a serious concern: the mental health strain of audits is growing. The stress of compliance is driving farmers away from assurance schemes altogether, despite their importance in securing market access. A shift towards digital-first, less intrusive assessments would allow for compliance without compromising well-being.
The message from the Review is clear: farm assurance needs urgent reform. Farmers should not be spending more and more time filling out paperwork, when they should be out on the farm, farming. The future lies in smarter auditing, better use of technology, and a shift away from excessive bureaucracy.
A smarter, more efficient farm assurance system is possible. But it will take industry-wide collaboration and a commitment to reducing the burden on farmers. If implemented correctly, these changes could restore trust, reduce stress, and make farm assurance work for those it is meant to support.
#BackBritishFarming #FarmAssuranceReview #AgriAudit
Some answers to questions often asked by our users
.webp)
